Gorgeous astrophotography of a mystery event. In 2002, the star V838 Mon suddenly brightened to about a million times as bright as our sun (becoming, briefly, the brightest star in the entire Milky Way galaxy). Just as suddenly, a month or so later, it rapidly dimmed. The curve of its luminosity over time is unlike any other event astronomers have ever recorded, and there's a great debate and investigation into what the mechanism might have been.
For almost 10 years, that pulse of light (or flash) has been expanding outward from V838 Mon, illuminating an ever-expanding light-month thick “bubble” of interstellar gas and dust. The Hubble telescope took the photo below in February 2004. The accompanying description says the bubble at that point is about 6 light-years in diameter, but I think that must be mistaken – it should be 4 light-years in diameter at that point. Via APOD, of course.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
Obama Worshipper – Not!
Reading today's Day-by-Day cartoon strip, you definitely get the feeling that Obama is not a President that cartoonist Chris Muir looks up to. An excerpt from the character's dialog:
The massive corruption, the transfer of our wealth to themselves and their cronies, the endless vacations, golf trips, parties, a private jet for their dog, the sheer hypocrisy of it all!Wow. Not a fan, Mr. Muir...
Clinton at least pretended there was any kind of law, but Obama truly is the example of the self-stroking ego of the boomers.
Labels:
Day-by-Day,
Obama,
Politics
Saturday, December 3, 2011
Cain Out...
Watching what's happened to him, my constant thought was “Is it any wonder that good, normal folks don't want to run for elected office?”
I have no desire to run for any elective office. I'm certain I'd make a terrible politician. But if I did want to run for office, the crap that candidates must endure (whether justified or not) is not something I would ever sign up for. I don't know about you, but I know about me: my life has been far from perfect, and there are a great many things I've been responsible for that I regret. They've also made me a better man. But there's no way I'd offer my life up for the kind of scrutiny (and potentially false accusations, as if the true ones weren't enough!) that a candidate like Herman Cain had to endure.
You have my deepest sympathy, Mr. Cain. I have no idea what kind of a president you would have made – and our corrupt, low-substance political process has unfortunately ensured that I never will...
I have no desire to run for any elective office. I'm certain I'd make a terrible politician. But if I did want to run for office, the crap that candidates must endure (whether justified or not) is not something I would ever sign up for. I don't know about you, but I know about me: my life has been far from perfect, and there are a great many things I've been responsible for that I regret. They've also made me a better man. But there's no way I'd offer my life up for the kind of scrutiny (and potentially false accusations, as if the true ones weren't enough!) that a candidate like Herman Cain had to endure.
You have my deepest sympathy, Mr. Cain. I have no idea what kind of a president you would have made – and our corrupt, low-substance political process has unfortunately ensured that I never will...
Labels:
2012 Elections,
Cain
On that Drop in the Unemployment Rate...
The “unexpected” drop in the unemployment rate (from 9.0% to 8.6%) isn't quite what it seems like. More than half of that drop was caused by a drop in the “participation rate”. What's that? It's the main fudge factor used by the government to dress up the widely reported overall unemployment statistic – it's one of the “adjustments” they make to the largely unreported raw unemployment number. This adjustment removes those people the government believes have permanently removed themselves from the ranks of those looking for work – including those who the government believes (or asserts) have permanently given up on the idea that they will ever be able to find a job. This oh-so-conveniently gives the government a tool to make the widely reported number look better than the raw number.
Me, I think that person who gave up (assuming they really did) is just as much unemployed as the person who hasn't given up – and they should be reported as part of the overall unemployment number. But I'm a well-known crank about such things...
Me, I think that person who gave up (assuming they really did) is just as much unemployed as the person who hasn't given up – and they should be reported as part of the overall unemployment number. But I'm a well-known crank about such things...
Labels:
Politics,
Unemployment
Accessible ClimateGate 2.0 Summary...
Stephen Hayward (an excellent commentator in general) has a great piece up at the Weekly Standard summarizing his findings upon reading about a third of the ClimateGate 2.0 document trove. There will be more, but in the meantime this is a very easy to understand summary (even for those not familiar with the ClimateGate brouhaha) of just why ClimateGate 2.0 is so disturbing...
Labels:
Anthropogenic Global Warming,
ClimateGate
Ode to the Incandescent Lamp...
I detest the light emitted by fluorescent lamps (including the very best CFLs) and by the top-notch LED lamps. Even more, I detest the loss of freedom that occurs when the government takes away a choice of mine. I like incandescent lighting, and I'm willing to pay extra to get it. I just placed an order for a stockpile of 100 watt and 250 watt lamps, and I will use them with pleasure until we run out of them. By then I'm hoping that either new technology for broad-spectrum lighting will be available, or the nanny statism we're current suffering under will be reversed, or that there will be an established black market for incandescents. Meanwhile, I can entirely sympathize with the viewpoint expressed here:
By the way, Reason magazine is one of the very few periodicals I still subscribe to. I get the same sort of joy from its arrival that the heroin addict gets when his next nickel bag is in his hands...
By the way, Reason magazine is one of the very few periodicals I still subscribe to. I get the same sort of joy from its arrival that the heroin addict gets when his next nickel bag is in his hands...
Labels:
Incandescent Lamps,
Nanny-Statism
Just Disgraceful...
More about the internal bumblings of the Justice Department on the “Fast & Furious” project. One can't help but observe the silence of the lamestream media on this scandal – compared with the trumpeting that would be happening if it were a Republican administration. Here we have bureaucratic screw-ups that killed American citizens, and the general public, for the most part, doesn't even know they occurred...
Labels:
Fast and Furious,
Obama,
Scandal
Most Popular Tools...
For web designers, that is, in a nice infographic (click the thumbnail below for something you can read).
Friday, December 2, 2011
A Little Maine Humor...
Via my mom, who says:
Personally, I don't think that's an accurate account of events. The Mainiacs I know would never convict these guys of a crime...This actually happened with some guys from Maine.They dressed the truck up with the guy dummy spread eagle on the roof.The driver and passenger put on Moose Heads.Down the Maine Toll interstate they went causing about 16 accidents.They went to jail.
Go, Miki, Go!
Debbie and Miki had six runs in agility competition this past weekend. This time we go them all on video!
On the Nature of Science...
Daniel Botkin has an interesting piece in today's Wall Street Journal...
Labels:
Anthropogenic Global Warming,
Science
Hide the Decline: Even Worse than We Thought!
Steve McIntyre finds some new evidence showing that to enhance the “hockey stick” nature of their temperature graph, Mann et al deleted 20 more years of data than we had previously believed. Truly this is shameful behavior on the part of these scientists – and arguably even more shameful on the cover-up of it...
Labels:
Anthropogenic Global Warming
The Case of the Missing Ocean Heat...
Yet another well-documented case of the climate models failing to predict measurable phenomena...
Labels:
Anthropogenic Global Warming,
ClimateGate
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Jackbooted Legions Coming to Arrest Us All??
Probably not. Reader Larry E. points me to a current flap amongst conservatives (check out the update as well). Larry hadn't read the bill, so wasn't sure just how bad this really was – but certainly didn't like the sound of it.
I found the text of the bill, and below is the language in question (Section 1031 of Senate Bill 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act for 2012). My reading of this: it authorizes the President to use military force to go after the 9/11 terrorists, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or others associated with them. Assuming that the last part of that is faithfully followed, I don't have any problem with this. If a member of the Taliban happens to be an American citizen, I still want the Marines to put a bullet in his heart. I believe our military is far better equipped to deal with many terrorist attack scenarios than our police forces are.
If I'm interpreting the hyperbolic fire-breathing of those wailing about this correctly, they're afraid that just about anybody could be accused of collaboration with al-Qaeda or the Taliban, and would then become subject to indefinite military detention (or even direct military action). I understand this fear, but I don't think this bill significantly expands the probability of such a thing. Both Bush and Obama have unilaterally asserted all sorts of Presidential powers that reasonable men believe were not theirs to grab. For example, it's not at all clear that Obama actually had the authority to order U.S. troops to fight in Libya. There has been precious little resistance to any of these power grabs. Even in the absence of this bill, if Obama decided to incarcerate (let's say) some citizens of Detroit accused of being al-Qaeda funding sources in Guantanamo, do you really thing the absence of clear authority would stop him? I do not, nor do I think it would have stopped Bush.
So I think this is much overblown...
I found the text of the bill, and below is the language in question (Section 1031 of Senate Bill 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act for 2012). My reading of this: it authorizes the President to use military force to go after the 9/11 terrorists, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or others associated with them. Assuming that the last part of that is faithfully followed, I don't have any problem with this. If a member of the Taliban happens to be an American citizen, I still want the Marines to put a bullet in his heart. I believe our military is far better equipped to deal with many terrorist attack scenarios than our police forces are.
If I'm interpreting the hyperbolic fire-breathing of those wailing about this correctly, they're afraid that just about anybody could be accused of collaboration with al-Qaeda or the Taliban, and would then become subject to indefinite military detention (or even direct military action). I understand this fear, but I don't think this bill significantly expands the probability of such a thing. Both Bush and Obama have unilaterally asserted all sorts of Presidential powers that reasonable men believe were not theirs to grab. For example, it's not at all clear that Obama actually had the authority to order U.S. troops to fight in Libya. There has been precious little resistance to any of these power grabs. Even in the absence of this bill, if Obama decided to incarcerate (let's say) some citizens of Detroit accused of being al-Qaeda funding sources in Guantanamo, do you really thing the absence of clear authority would stop him? I do not, nor do I think it would have stopped Bush.
So I think this is much overblown...
SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.
(a) In General- Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war.
(b) Covered Persons- A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
(c) Disposition Under Law of War- The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111-84)).
(3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent tribunal having lawful jurisdiction.
(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person's country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.
(d) Construction- Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(e) Requirement for Briefings of Congress- The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress regarding the application of the authority described in this section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be `covered persons' for purposes of subsection (b)(2).
Labels:
Presidential Power
Evaporated Man...
William Gensert has an interesting piece up on the American Thinker, full of links for citations and additional reading. A tip 'o the hat to reader Simi L. An excerpt:
Obama believes himself a good man. Yet, with no depth or breadth, he is victim to the ideology he has been steeped in his entire life, a captive of his conviction that he is on the side of what is right and just. The benevolent hand of Barack Obama has wrought more havoc upon the freedom of our nation than any enemy ever could, for while evil can wreak untold damage, it takes the truly self-righteous to destroy a nation.
Edmund Burke said that "all that is necessary for evil to triumph, is that good men to do nothing." Yet it is also true that the greatest evil has, just as often as not, been perpetrated by good men seeking to do something.
War Memorial...
Via my mom:
After more than 40 years, the Vietnam Veterans of the United States of America have raised a phenomenal amount of money to memorialize another one of Hollywood ’s loyal American citizens, who went out of her way to aid and abet the enemy and congratulate them on their treatment of U.S. POW's.
Be sure to stop in and pay your “respects!”
Weird Weather...
Just before I went out to walk the dogs this morning, the heavens opened up and it poured – but only for a few minutes. We got about 1 mm (4 hundredths of an inch) of rain. The ground is wet, and all the brush was freshly dampened. As I write this, it's raining again.
That part is only a little odd. Here's the really weird part: we had a low pressure system move through last night that has our current pressure down to quite a low level. Usually that means “big storm” is coming. The temperatures have dropped as well (see instrument graphs at right, click to enlarge). The forecast calls for Santa Ana-like wind conditions, but with the winds coming from the west instead of the east. Here's an explanation of this odd phenomenon (called the “Inside Slider”). We're located in the southern part of a strange local eddy. Should be an interesting weather day or two!
That part is only a little odd. Here's the really weird part: we had a low pressure system move through last night that has our current pressure down to quite a low level. Usually that means “big storm” is coming. The temperatures have dropped as well (see instrument graphs at right, click to enlarge). The forecast calls for Santa Ana-like wind conditions, but with the winds coming from the west instead of the east. Here's an explanation of this odd phenomenon (called the “Inside Slider”). We're located in the southern part of a strange local eddy. Should be an interesting weather day or two!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






