Showing posts with label Litigation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Litigation. Show all posts
Friday, April 20, 2012
Creative Litigation of the Day...
From Austalia: Worker injured during sex gets compensation payout.
Labels:
Humor,
Litigation,
Sex
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Oracle v. Google...
Reading this brought back lots of memories, of the Stac v. Microsoft case in the early '90s, in which I was a participant...
Labels:
Intellectual Property,
Litigation
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Oh, Jeez...
I hadn't thought of this angle before, but obviously the AGW proponents have. Is there nothing the courts can't screw up?
Labels:
Anthropogenic Global Warming,
Litigation
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
ClimateGate: That Didn't Take Long...
The Department of Energy (DOE) sent a notice that starts as below to 8,000 or so employees of its Savanah River Site in South Carolina:
Sounds like litigation. I wonder who is suing who, and on what theory?
December 14, 2009Read the whole thing here.
DOE Litigation Hold Notice
DOE-SR has received a “Litigation Hold Notice” from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) General Council and the DOE Office of Inspector General regarding the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England. Accordingly, they are requesting that SRNS, SRR and other Site contractors locate and preserve all documents, records, data, correspondence, notes, and other materials, whether official or unofficial, original or duplicative, drafts or final versions, partial or complete that may relate to the global warming, including, but not limited to, the contract files, any related correspondence files, and any records, including emails or other correspondence, notes, documents, or other material related to this contract, regardless of its location or medium on which it is stored. In other words, please preserve any and all documents relevant to “global warming, the Climate Research Unit at he University of East Anglia In England, and/or climate change science.”
Sounds like litigation. I wonder who is suing who, and on what theory?
Labels:
ClimateGate,
Litigation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)