Sunday, March 9, 2008
When most people talk about the desert wildflowers, the Desert Sand Verbena (Abronia villosa), or just Sand Verbena, is what they're thinking of. I like the Sand Verbena, but it's far from my favorite wildflower – and I actually prefer it when individual plants are on display, rather than the verbena carpets that appear in some areas – such as further north, especially around Borrego Springs, where many acres of desert floor are covered with verbena after a good rain. Down in the southern part of the park it's not quite so abundant, but there's plenty of it nonetheless. We found the best displays about a mile and a half east of S-2 on South Carrizo Creek Road (4WD), in an area with a relatively large, flat expanse of sandy wash.As its name implies, the Sand Verbena likes to live on sand. Because shoulders of paved roads in the desert are often made of sand, it is frequently found there. Any sandy desert wash is also prime territory for it. The Sand Verbena's leaves are covered with fine, short, and very sticky hairs. In the photo above, you can see the individual sand grains sticking tightly to the hairs. There must be some advantage conveyed by the sand, or evolution wouldn't have favored it (producing the sticky stuff must incur a cost). Perhaps the sand helps weigh the leaf down, making it better able to survive windy periods? Or perhaps the sand helps keep the plant cool?



The Carrizo Badlands Overlook (and its immediate surrounds) is the place to go for the beautiful Desert Lupine (Lupinus sparsiflorus). On the hilltop right at the overlook, and on the east side of the road on both sides of it, these lupine grow by the tens of thousands.
Yesterday it was a bit early in the season to catch the lupine. Relatively few plants are in bloom (but even then there were thousands of them), but their color is particularly fresh and vibrant. If you visit a stand over the course of a few weeks, you'll see the colors change subtley over time as the sun fades them – they get less saturated, more purely blue, and less even.
As we walked around on the overlook, we could see that there were 10 or 20 lupine plants too young to bloom for each one that was in bloom. The plants are easy to spot because of their characteristic palmate leaves and their deep green color. My guess is that in a couple of weeks there will be a sea of lupine there (and I will be back to visit them!).
In past years that were good for wildflowers, the overlook area provided by far the most sumptuous displays in the southern Anza Borrego (at least, that I ever saw). The lupine were the centerpiece, but there are also several hillsides there that can be saturated with the yellows, whites, and blues of other desert wildflowers. If for some sad reason I was restricted to visiting only one site in the southern Anza Borrego, the Carrizo Badlands Overlook would be it...

The fish-hook or strawberry cactus (Mammillaria dioica) is my favorite of all the cacti in the Anza Borrego. My best explanation for this: they're cute! They are small (under a foot tall and just two or three inches in diameter), furry-looking (until you get close enough to see the stout, sharp spines!), and colorful. They seem to like best areas that are protected by immediately adjacent rocks and boulders, and this leads to some very picturesque settings for them.They're also mainly confined to specific areas. On our trip yesterday, we only saw them in one place – a small canyon just east of S-2 and just south of Box Canyon. There's a short, unmarked dirt road (perhaps 100 yards long, safe for 2WD) that leads to a small clearing and a place to park. The only sign is a small, brown sign declaring this a wilderness area. If you didn't know the canyon was there, you'd think there was nothing to see – most of the “good stuff” is just around the corner. There is a vague trail that runs up the canyon floor, but it really doesn't matter where you walk. The sand and gravel wash at the very bottom form a distinct micro-environment, with its own flora. If you look carefully as you walk, you'll be able to identify other such micro-environments as well. Nearly every plant has some special place that it likes to grow. For instance, the large barrel cacti seem to like steep, stony slopes the best. The teddy bear cholla grows most often on slightly exposed, slightly higher places. You'll find Chuparosa in sandy washes. In a place like this little canyon there may be dozens of such micro-environments, each with its characteristic set of species...
Here's my photos from yesterday. As always, click on these images to see a larger version:









We saw the desert dandelion (Malacothrix californica) in many places yesterday, sometimes in profusion (especially near the Carrizo Badlands Overlook) and sometimes just a few plants. It's another member of the sunflower family (Asteraceae).
The common names for this plant are interesting. The common English name that most of us know is, of course, “dandelion” – which is a corruption of the French dent de lion, or “lion's tooth”, referring to the deeply toothed leaves. The French common name, on the other hand (according to Wikipedia), is “pissenlit”, which means “urinate in bed”, referring to the plant's diuretic properties. Read the Wikipedia entry for even more...
The desert chicory (Rafinesquia neomexicana) is a member of the sunflower family (Asteraceae), and is quite common in many places in the Anza Borrego desert. We saw them yesterday on every stop we made down on the desert floor, including in the lower reaches of the Oriflamme Canyon.Sometimes you can find a splash of white across the desert floor, comprised of hundreds of desert chicory blooms. But my favorite display of them is when a solitary plant shows its cheerful little blossom in some out-of-the-way, unlikely, hostile-looking place. The desert chicory strikes me as a plucky little fighter that's happy to go live where most other plants fail...
The creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) is not a plant that excites most people. It's the most common shrub in our desert, generally looks pretty ratty, has small and inconspicuous flowers that don't smell good, and little tiny green leaves that leave an oily smear on your fingers or clothes if you brush up against it. If you crush the leaves, it smells vaguely of creosote. I'd read that if you create some humid air around its leaves by cupping your hands around a twig and blowing into them, you'll smell the wonderful aroma of rain on the desert. I tried it, and I think people are smoking something they shouldn't oughtta be – smells like a combination of stale breath and creosote to me.
But there really are some interesting things about the creosote bush. For starters, the individual plants live a very long time for a shrub: 100 to 200 years, possibly more. They produce lots and lots of seeds, but the germination rate is very low. Most of the individual plants are actually clones. It works like this: a single ancestral plant germinates from windblown or bird-carried seed, far from any other creosote bushes. That plant grows for a hundred years or so, gradually increasing in diameter, with the younger shoots on the outside.
Eventually the inner, older shoots die off, leaving a ring-shaped shrub. These are rare, but they do exist – I've seen four or five over the years. These rings gradually increase in size by the same mechanism, until (I've read) they are something like 20 to 50 feet in diameter. The biggest one I've ever seen was only about 6 feet in diameter, with about a 4 foot in diameter “dead zone” in the middle.
The scarcest resource for these plants is water; the creosote bush grows an extensive network of fine roots close to the surface to capture as much water as it can. If there is a ring of creosote plants that are (say) 20 feet in diameter, there's much more opportunity to capture water outside the ring than there is inside the ring – so more new shoots propagate in that direction. As the ring gets bigger and bigger, over thousands and even tens of thousands of years, they tend to leave fairly regularly-spaced individuals in the middle, with the spacing determined by the available rainfall. All of these individual plants are genetic clones, and taken together, there are some colonies that are on the order of 10,000 to 15,000 years old – and over a mile in diameter!
Another interesting fact about the creosote bush is probably mainly driven by how common it is, and how many flowers it has. There are at least 22 species of bees that specialize in feeding from the nectar and pollen of the creosote bush. These bees won't visit the flowers of any other plant. I can't identify any of them, but there's a very good chance that the bee I captured in the photo above is one of those 22 species...
Chuparosa (Beloperone californica) is a very odd plant. It's a member of the tropical Acanthus family (Acanthaceae), the only one that grows naturally this far north. Most individual plants have no leaves at all, and when they do have leaves (as in the plant photographed at right), they're little teeny things that you have to look closely to find. The common name means “sucking rose” in Spanish, a reference to the abundant nectar produced by the blossoms. Hummingbirds love this thing.
Over the years, on previous visits to the desert, I've probably snapped twenty photos of chuparosa. Not one of them turned out any better than you'd expect from a drunken sailor distracted by naked dancing girls. And no, I wasn't drunk and there were no naked dancing girls (darn it!). Yesterday I took eight chuparosa photos, and this was the only one that looked good (click on it to see a larger version). I'm happy to finally get one that I'm happy with!
Mark Steyn has this marvelous talent for discovering new perspectives on politics and the state of the planet, and then teaching us about it while simultaneously inducing belly laughs and cracked faces from prolonged over-stretched grinning. He can do this even when the perspective is painful – as Mary Poppins said: “Just a spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down in the most delightful way!”
Except Mr. Steyn delivers the sugar by the truckload.
To a political junkie like myself, today's column is one of the funniest I have ever read. I read some parts of it four or five times, just to savor the wit on display. Here's one passage, just to tease you:
The Democratic primary season seems to have dwindled down into a psycho remake of “Driving Miss Daisy.” The fading matriarch Mizz Hill'ry (Jessica Tandy) doesn't want to give up the keys to the Democratic Party vehicle but the dignified black chauffeur Hokey (Morgan Freeman) insists it'll be a much smoother ride with him in the driver's seat. Yet, just as he thinks the old biddy's resigned to a nomination as Best Supporting Actress, the backseat driver plunges her hat pin into his spine, wrests the wheel away and lurches across the median.
...but really, you don't want to miss the whole darned thing!
Saturday, March 8, 2008
We're back from our trip out to the Anza-Borrego Desert. How was it?
It was very good, but not quite prime yet. The stretch of S-2 between Ocotillo and the Carrizo Badlands Overlook is nice, with plenty of flowers – but the ocotillos are in bud (at best), and you see more buds and small plants than you do flowers. The overlook it self has a fair number of young and very fresh-looking lupine, and several other wildflowers are also quite abundant. One of the hills at the overlook has a yellow wash. Baby lupine plants are everywhere.
Further north, up the South Carrizo Creek, we found verbena (lots of it), and a few other flowers – including the lovely desert lily (Hesperocallis undulata) above. We found perhaps ten or twelve desert lilies in full bloom, a roughly equal number in bud, and around 100 plants too young to even have buds. That's more desert lilies than I've ever seen on such a brief walk. Desert lily fans (of which I am one) are in for a treat this year, I think.
We walked up a draw that we've been to many times before, but don't know it's name. It's in a wilderness area, on the east side of S-2, a few miles south of the Butterfield RV park. It was also early in the season for it, but there were lots of Mexican poppies and miniature barrel cacti to enchant us.
We ended the trip by four-wheeling up Oriflamme Canyon. In the lower reaches, a blue wildflower was profuse, forming large dense patches of a saturated deep blue color amongst the emerald green foliage of this wet year. Really, really lovely. On the lower hills, usually high on the south or southwest faces, were large patches of California poppies. At this point we didn't have the energy to hike up to them, but I'm planning to go back next week to see them.
I took about 250 photos today; I'll post more tomorrow...
Have you ever looked at some unfamiliar source code and found yourself confused about the purpose of some parameters in method invocations? Take the following little snippet:
PuppyBlender pb = new PuppyBlender();
Puppy pup = new Puppy("Fido");
pb.blend(pup, true);
What on earth does that “true” parameter mean? The only way you can find out, given the code above, is to go look at the documentation or source code for the PuppyBlender class.
There's an easy way to write such code without the ambiguity:
PuppyBlender pb = new PuppyBlender();
Puppy pup = new Puppy("Fido");
boolean pulseMode = true;
pb.blend(pup, pulseMode);
One little extra line of code, and now we've made the purpose of that parameter quite clear. Modern compilers will optimize that variable out, so there's no performance impact at all.Just clarity.
I am leaving shortly with some friends to drive out to the southern parts of the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park – along state route S2, northwest of Ocotillo, California. Several reports from a week ago say that the wildflowers were just starting, so we're hoping that we hit the beginning of the prime season today. If it really is a good wildflower year, then the next several weeks should be great!
I am going armed with my camera, of course, so you'll know by the photos whether we were successful in our quest...
Friday, March 7, 2008
A crazed gunman – of course, a fundamentalist Islamic radical – runs into a yeshiva (a Jewish school) in Israel, kills seven outright and wounds at least ten others (some of whom are not likely to survive). In Palestine, the streets erupt in celebration, with green Hamas banners sprouting like spring grass, thousands of rounds fired into the air, and candy being handed out in large quantities. Hamas immediately claimed “credit”, calling the actions of the shooter “heroic”.
How should Israel respond?
The state of Israel has basically the only well-functioning government in the entire region. It is the only country whose citizens (including the Arabic citizens!) are free, by virtually any measure one could apply. Ever since the state of Israel was created, they've been more or less continuously attacked by their neighbors and more distant Arabic and Islamic states or their proxies (for example, Iran is the primary sponsor of Hamas). So far as I can tell, there's a small group of the good guys (Israel) – the kind of people and culture we'd like to have as friends – surrounded and attacked on all sides by the bad guys. I sure can't see much to savor or cherish about the people and culture attacking Israel.
So here's how I think Israel should respond: I think they should use their vastly superior and (currrently) voluntarily hobbled military power to deliver a message that couldn't possibly be misinterpreted by even the most primitive, addle-brained adversary. The message should be: if you attack our people, we will respond in an overwhelmingly painful and permanent way. In other words, the response should be as disproportionate as you can possibly make it. For example, in the current situation Hamas has already publicly claimed responsibility for the attack, and then celebrated afterward. Fine. Israel, please wipe out Hamas in Gaza. Kill anyone who resists. Re-occupy Gaza and declare that you are permanently annexing that land. Any citizens of Gaza who don't want to be citizens of Israel get a free trip to the putrid paradise of Palestine. Choose military effectiveness and threat reduction over mercy. Make the Palestinians, your other enemies (and their masters), and the entire world aware of the perilous cost of attacking Israel.
This is, I believe, the only “peace process” with a genuine chance for success. As uncomfortable as this is for any liberal to accept, history teaches us an uncomfortable truth: humiliating defeat is the most common path to a lasting peace.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Chills. Awe. Shivers. Just go watch this!
“Monster” is a cable brand, found in nearly every electronic store on the planet. The price of their audio cables – even speaker cables – is simply mind-boggling. It would be easy to pay more for the cables than you did for the speakers!
As an electrical engineer, I could never make any sense from the claims, always expressed in hyperbolic, impressive-sounding pseudo-engineering jargon. The physical principles of a cable, at audio frequencies (things are a lot different at radio frequencies), are really quite straightforward. I have long been skeptical that there was any perceptible difference between cables costing $50/foot and those costing $0.05/foot.
But the folks at Engadget note a test in which some engineer took this skepticism just a bit further:
We've always believed that the perceived quality boost that comes from using high-end cables is really just a trick of the mind (read: justifying the ridiculous cost of premium cables to yourself) -- if you've dropped enough cash, you can probably hear anything you want. Still, our belief is one thing -- cold hard proof is another, and it looks like a group of 12 self-professed "audiophiles" recently couldn't tell the difference between Monster 1000 speaker cables and plain old coat hangers. Yeah, coat hangers. The group was A-Bing different cables, and unbeknownst to them, the engineer running the test swapped out a set of cables for coat hangers with soldered-on speaker connections. Not a single one was then able to tell the difference between the Monster Cable and the hangers, and all agreed that the hangers sounded excellent. No wonder Monster has to rig HD displays. Still, we bet people still fall for the hype -- oh hey, if you're looking for the ultimate in sound, we've got half a meter of oxygen-free, triple-wrapped double-insulated Sonically Shielded AmpliSized Egyptian Llama cable here that we'll part ways with for just a couple grand.
Heh. I have a new-found respect for those coat-hangers!
And case closed, in my book.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
From Tim Blair:
Ron Paul (R-Lunar Orbit) is returned to Congress.
Heh. (patented by InstaPundit)
Well, not quite. But Clinton picked up three badly needed wins (after ten-in-a-row for Obama) that she can talk about. In all three cases (especially Texas) her win was very narrow, and because the Democratic primaries generally apportion delegates proportionally to the vote that means that her delegate gain is slight. Texas (and some other states) have an even more complicated delegate apportionment: some delegates are apportioned proportionally to the primary vote, and others are apportioned based on caucuses (cauci?) held on the same day as the primary.
The Republican primaries, by contrast, are generally winner-take-all affairs. Last night, for example, McCain won Ohio and all of the delegates, even though he took only 60% of the vote. Texas apparently has some other method of delegate apportionment, as the media is reporting that Huckabee has taken some delegates from there (though McCain clearly won the state). Huckabee's delegate win is smaller (percentage-wise) than his vote win, so I'm not sure what their system is.
I think the bottom line here, basically, is good news for the Republicans – Clinton and Obama will continue their battle now, focusing more on each other than they are on McCain. With each day that goes by, they throw more criticism at each other – and all of that will be fodder for the Republicans in the general election. Meanwhile, McCain last night officially sewed up the Republican nomination (though that still may not be enough to get the quixotic Huckabee to cough up a concession speech!) and can spend the rest of the campaign focusing on differentiating himself from the squabbling Democratic candidates.
Advantage: Republicans.
Update: Huckabee conceded last night (I just read about it), and committed to support the Republican ticket (i.e., McCain).
Advantage: Republicans, now unified against a split Democratic party...