Non-Union Workers Enslave Unions!

Indiana employers are being sued on the grounds that they're enslaving unions by hiring non-union workers.  From an article at the Daily Caller:

The new lawsuit suggests that when nonunion employees earn higher salaries and better benefits because of the union’s negotiation on behalf of its members, the union has been forced to work for those nonunion employees for free.

And being forced to work without compensation, the union suggested in its revised lawsuit, is slavery.

Strictly from the perspective of an observer of creative litigation, this is absolutely awesome.  Should it succeed, it would throw open the door for more creative lawsuits.  For example, I might consider suing my employer for enslavement – they're “forcing” me to spend unpaid hours on the road for my commute, because I live so far from my employer's offices.  Clearly they should either pay me for those hours of commute, or count them as work hours.  Slavers!

But from just about any other perspective (aside from the slavering socialists, anyway), this is more demonstration of the decay of legitimate purpose for labor unions (as if we really needed any!).  I'm not in favor of outlawing unions, or anything nearly so radical – despite these ludicrous excesses, they do occasionally have a legitimate purpose in the U.S.  But I would be in favor of some carefully-crafted limits on their power and reach – most especially for the public sector unions, who in places like California (at the state level) and San Diego (at the city level) virtually “own” our local governments...