Thursday, March 31, 2005

How does the man do it?

Mark Steyn: the man is a first-class column machine-gun stud. I can't imagine how any single human could produce stuff of this quality day in and day out.

And I didn't think anybody was going to be able to make me smile today, much less laugh. But Mark did:

Do you remember a fellow called Robert Wendland? No reason why you should. I wrote about him in this space in 1998, and had intended to return to the subject but something else always intervened — usually Bill Clinton’s penis, which loomed large, at least metaphorically, over the entire era. Mr Wendland lived in Stockton, California. He was injured in an automobile accident in 1993 and went into a coma. Under state law, he could have been starved to death at any time had his wife requested the removal of his feeding tube. But Rose Wendland was busy with this and that, as one is, and assumed there was no particular urgency.

Then one day, a year later, Robert woke up. He wasn’t exactly his old self, but he could catch and throw a ball and wheel his chair up and down the hospital corridors, and both activities gave him pleasure. Nevertheless Mrs Wendland decided that she now wished to exercise her right to have him dehydrated to death. Her justification was that, while the actual living Robert — the Robert of the mid-1990s — might enjoy a simple life of ball-catching and chair-rolling, the old Robert — the pre-1993 Robert — would have considered it a crashing bore and would have wanted no part of it.

You'll be sorry if you don't read the whole thing.

Tell me it ain't so!

Would you believe that 11 illegal aliens could board an U.S. airliner with minimal ID? Bryan Preston posts this scary report on Michelle Malkin's great new Immigration Blog.

The good news is that an air marshal's vigilence led to the capture of these illegal aliens, and they are now detained pending a deportation hearing (and after they're deported they'll probably bounce right back in, but that's another story). The bad news is that they got on that plane in the first place. As Bryan reports it:

Good for the air marshalls on this one, but bad for airline security. Read that second paragraph again--how did the illegals get on that plane? By presenting a "Mexican voter registration card that contained a name, age and photo." That should not be sufficient ID to board a plane in the post-911 United States. And yet it is.

Chances are, by the way, that the "voter registration card" in this story is actually a matricula consular card. Those cards are issued by the Mexican government to...well...just about anyone:

Management of Chaos

Nice report, TigerHawk. A teaser excerpt:

So where does the war stand now, according to al Qaeda? A leading al Qaeda operative has written a book, the title of which translates loosely to “The Management of Chaos.” According to al Qaeda, the current stage of revolution is the stage of “vexation and exhaustion” of the enemy. They have a notion of how to do this to the Americans and to their 'puppets'.

You vex and exhaust the Americans, according to al Qaeda, by making them spend a lot of money. The United States is a materialist society, and if forced to spend too much money it will “cut and run.”

The means to this end is to force the Americans to spread themselves thinly. Al Qaeda wants to strike everywhere, not just spectacular high value attacks. This will cause the Americans to defend a lot of places at high cost.

In addition, al Qaeda wants to force Americans to carry the war into the heartland of the Middle East [We have obliged them in this. - ed.] There are two reasons why al Qaeda sought an American invasion in the Middle East. First, it will be very costly for the United States and will therefore drain our treasury. Second, bringing the war to the heartland will have a polarizing effect within Muslim society. Doran believes that they borrowed this “polarization” idea from Palestinian organizations of the 60s and 70s. Americans striking back “without precision” will polarize Muslim society between supporters and proponents of jihad.

It is not necessary, according to al Qaeda, that they get the great masses on their side. The goal is to win over “an important segment of the youth.” Their propaganda is directed to young men. One of their propagandists says that “if we can win over only 5% of one billion Muslims, we will have an unbeatable army.”

Now go read the whole thing. There will be a test afterward. The lecture was by Professor Michael Doran.

That Lance

The Lance in Iraq blog of 1st LT Lance Frizzell has become a regular part of my blog-reading routine. Read it for a few days and I suspect you'll be hooked as well. Today he posted some commentary about the importance of winning over the Iraqi teens, along with a selection of endearing pictures like the one I've reproduced here. Don't miss it!

Hat tip to Lance for the pointer to this article on the significance of the Iraqi teens...

A big prize

Dr. Boyle is a radiologist who also happens to have an excellent blog. He's not happy about what he's heard on the media about the interpretation of Terri Schiavo's CT scans. His central points are:

-- The TV talking head docs pontificating on the CT scans are neurologists, not radiologists...and neurologists don't interpret CT brain scans, radiologists do.

-- He does not believe it is possible to reliably diagnose persistent vegetative state from CT scans.

And he's willing to put his money where his mouth is:

Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?

To prove my point I am offering $100,000 on a $25,000 wager for ANY neurologist (and $125,000 for any neurologist/bioethicist) involved in Terri Schiavo's case--including all the neurologists reviewed on television and in the newspapers who can accurately single out PVS patients from functioning patients with better than 60% accuracy on CT scans.

I will provide 100 single cuts from 100 different patient's brain CT's. All the neurologist has to do is say which ones represent patients with PVS and which do not.

If the neurologist can be right 6 out of 10 times he wins the $100,000.

I Said What I Meant, And I Meant What I Said

My points are what I first said about the image from Terri Schiavo's CT scan:

1) It is NOT as bad as the neurologists and bioethicists play it up to be; and,

2) There are many elderly patients with various levels of mental functioning who have severe atrophy that is difficult to distinguish from Terri Schiavo's atrophy

I stand by what I said. And I'm putting my money where my mouth is.

First, I can't help but applaud Dr. Boyle's activism here. Whether he's right or wrong, good for him for standing up and so forcefully making his case.

But on a different level, I find this quite troubling. Dr. Boyle is making a credible case (and standing behind it with his personal fortune!) that Terri's 'diagnosis' is even more flawed than I had heretofore believed. Making it even more likely that Terri has (had?) some hope of partial recovery through appropriate (but untried) therapy. And making it even more horrible that the courts have condemned her to die by starvation and dehydration. How could we let this happen in the U.S.? This is a series of actions of the type I'd expect to find in a place like North Korea or Yemen, not here...

Hat tip to Michelle Malkin for the pointer to this story...

We should worry

Peggy Noonan, writing in today's Opinion Journal, warns Republicans not to be dismissive of Hillary's run:

Republicans--I have been among many--are now in the stage of the Hillary Conversation in which they are beginning to grouse about those who keep warning that Mrs. Clinton will be a formidable candidate for president in 2008. She won't be so tough, they say. America will never elect a woman like her, with such a sketchy history--financial scandals, political pardons, the whole mess that took place between 1980 and 2000.

I tell them they are wrong. First, it is good to be concerned about Mrs. Clinton, for she is coming down the pike. It is pointless to be afraid, but good to be concerned. Why? Because we live in a more or less 50-50 nation; because Mrs. Clinton is smarter than her husband and has become a better campaigner on the ground; because her warmth and humor seem less oily; because she has struck out a new rhetorically (though not legislatively) moderate course; because you don't play every card right the way she's been playing every card right the past five years unless you have real talent; because unlike her husband she has found it possible to grow more emotionally mature; because the presidency is the bright sharp focus of everything she does each day; because she is not going to get seriously dinged in the 2008 primaries but will likely face challengers who make her look even more moderate and stable; and because in 2008 we will have millions of 18- to 24-year-old voters who have no memory of her as the harridan of the East Wing and the nutty professor of HillaryCare.

The Hillary those young adults remember will be the senator--chuckling with a throaty chuckle, bantering amiably with Lindsey Graham, maternal and moderate and strong. Add to that this: Half the MSM will be for her, and the other half will be afraid of the half that is for her. (You think journalists are afraid of the right? Journalists are afraid of each other.) And on top of all that, It's time for a woman. Almost every young woman in America, every tough old suburban momma, every unmarried urban high-heel-wearing, briefcase-toting corporate lawyer will be saying it. They'll be working for, rooting for, giving to the woman.

I am of course exaggerating, but not by much.

Of course underestimation of a political opponent is an absolutely classic mistake to make. I dismiss Hillary's opinions and world view (as expressed through the prism of her overriding ambition) all the time; 'tis but a small step from there to being dismissive of her political skills. I can easily see this happening -- much as happened to Mr. Bush in 2000. I'm with Peggy; I hope the Republican powers-that-be don't make the mistake of 'misunderestimating' Hillary Clinton.

Because the consequences would be very hard to bear...

Quote for the day

# It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.

   Alexander Hamilton

Wednesday, March 30, 2005

A young Afghani

Waheed at Afghan Warrior posts and interesting Q & A.

Katz on Terri

This note resonates strongly with me. A hat tip to American Thinker. I reproduce the short note in its entirety:The essence of the Terri Schiavo case is simple, all ink and hot air to the contrary. We, as a society, the government and people of the United States of

America, have not managed, for whatever reasons, to permit a mother, deluded or not, to put water onto the lips of her dying child, brain dead or not.

Everything else, every legal, moral, theological, constitutional, or philosophical argument, is a sideshow, diverting attention from the essential issue of this case.

We have wounded our national character. By our actions, or inactions, we have placed ourselves one notch less, above the Nazis.

We, as a people, have so shamed ourselves, that we cannot look Mary Schindler, Terri Schiavo's mother, in the eye, and give her one good reason why WE did not allow her to give water to her dying child.

How we came to this shameful point in our national existence is a question that demands examination, and rectification. For our sake.

For Mary Schindler, and her severely impaired child, Terri Schiavo, it is too late. We did not find it in our collective hearts and souls, in our actions, to have mercy on them.

May We, and G_d, forgive us.

Martin Katz

Pocket doors

Don't miss Pocket Doors and My Manhood!

Quote for the day

He who loses wealth loses much; he who loses a friend loses more; but he that loses his courage loses all.

   Miguel de Cervantes

Monday, March 28, 2005

Tethers in space

First, let me say that I'm very happy to see NASA taking the route of a prize, much like the X prize, to promote a speculative new technology. For a relatively small sum (at least by U.S. government agency standards!), they will either harness the competitive energies of the civilian sector, or they will get (for free) the collective judgment that the objective is impossible. Good move, and very un-government-like. I applaud it.

In the specific case of tethers, they've set a very tough objective — especially because the primary objective of the prize is a space elevator (a tether from the Earth's surface to a satellite in geosynchronous orbit). If all of this is just blarney and blather to you, take a gander at this short Wikipedia article on the subject.

Personally, my main concern with a space elevator tether system is their vulnerability to micro-meteorite and "space junk". Lives and an investment of billions of dollars could be taken out by an empty Coke can (figuratively speaking) whizzing around in orbit. Not a pretty picture...

A role for Iraq

Tigerhawk found some interesting facts about Arab book production and consumption, and speculates on the reasons why and how Iraq could change things. Basically his idea is that Iraq could turn into an engine for the translation and production of information in Arabic languages. This engine would be enabled by a free and open press, and an Arabic population that also happens to know English. Interesting stuff...

Sweet irony

Osama bin Laden can't be a stupid man. Therefore he must realize that the train of events that his infamous attacks of 9/11/2001 set in motion are taking the world down the exactly opposite course than the one he intended. What sweet irony!

Imagine this... Sometime in the past few months, perhaps shortly after the Iraqi elections. Osama is crouched in some rude hut in the wilds of Afghanistan, or perhaps northeastern Iran. Up until this moment, he's been thinking that despite a few tactical reverses, his war on America is enjoying some strategic success. Then there is "the moment" — one I'd give anything to personally witness — when it dawns on him that the world's reaction to the 9/11 attacks is going to defeat his movement.

Perhaps I exult prematurely. But I think not.

Quote for the day

Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.

   Charles de Gaulle

Sunday, March 27, 2005

Cedar Fire photo

The Cedar Fire of October/November 2003 was by far the closest call we've ever had to having our home and property burn. For those of you who aren't familiar with the chapparal ecological system we live in, I can say it like this: basically we live in an area where we are completely surrounded by large piles of very dry, highly inflammable fuel. Without human intervention, we're told that lightning-started fires would burn chapparal areas typically every 15 to 30 years. The area immediately surrounding our home hasn't burned for over 30 years, which means that we have a huge and extremely dangerous "fuel load" in our area. The vastness of the chapparal area means that cleaning it up and disposing of the fuel really isn't practical. Not to mention that you'd destroy all the native plants and animals in the process. So...we're left in this ever-more-precarious situation, exacerbated by the seven years of drought (but thankfully the drought is over due to the above-normal rain this year).

But we do it anyway, because we love the chapparal...

The blue dot on the map is the approximate location of our home; the green smudge is where the city of San Diego is located (about 25 miles from our house). The red rectangles are the locations of the burning areas at the moment this picture was taken (an infrared sensor on the satellite provided the data for this). You can see a burning area due south of our home; that's the Otay Fire. The large oblong group of red rectangles north of our home is the Cedar Fire, burning in all directions from its center. Further north is the Escondido Fire. We didn't have this information at the time of the fire, but we did know that our home was directly in between the Cedar Fire (burning south toward us) and the Otay fire (burning north toward us). It was not a pleasant situation. I wrote a contemporaneous account and photos on my personal web site. On that web site's home page you can find links followup accounts and photos as well.

Click on the photo for a bigger version.

Gravitational lensing

This astrophotograph captures a phenomenon that very graphically demonstrates Einstein's insight that gravity can bend the path of light. What looks like four stars (or galactic nuclei) in the picture are actually four separate virtual images of the same quasar, which is located far behind the galaxy whose faint image is all around the four quasar images. The intense gravity in the dense core of the galaxy acts like a gigantic lens that just happens to be directly between us and the distant quasar. Result: these four images of the quasar. You can read all about it here, with pointers to more information.

Desert wildflowers

Yesterday and Sunday two weeks ago we made a trip out to our local Anza-Borrego desert to see the wildflowers. They were by far the best we have ever seen — carpets of lupine, golden poppies, and dozens of other kinds of flowers. At a place called the Carrizo Badlands overlook, we stepped out of the car into the middle of hundreds of acres that were literally blanketed with wildflowers in their prime. The hillside in this picture is just a hundred yards or so from the roadside. The concentrated flowers also made for a concentrated wildflower perfume; a odiferous treat on top of the visual treat. Later in the day we hiked up Smuggler's Canyon, which was also in prime. We also four-wheeled up Oriflamme Canyon, where the different elevations and environments served up even more varieties of wildflowers. It was quite a day...

Click on the picture for a bigger version.

New Estonian government

A local analyzes the political situation (which is complicated!). From Baltic Blog.

No compelling reason

If you care at all about the Terri Schiavo sitution, Mr. Steyn's latest column is not to be missed. He starts like this:

A couple of decades back, north of the border, it was discovered that some overzealous types in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police had been surreptitiously burning down the barns of Quebec separatists. The prime minister, Pierre Trudeau, shrugged off the controversy and blithely remarked that, if people were so upset by the Mounties illegally burning down barns, perhaps he'd make the burning of barns by Mounties legal. As the columnist George Jonas commented:

''It seemed not to occur to him that it isn't wrong to burn down barns because it's illegal, but it's illegal to burn down barns because it's wrong. Like other statist politicians, Mr. Trudeau . . . either didn't see, or resented, that right and wrong are only reflected by the laws, not determined by them.''

That's how I feel about the Terri Schiavo case. I'm neither a Floridian nor a lawyer, and, for all I know, it may be legal under Florida law for the state to order her to be starved to death. But it is still wrong.

This is not a criminal, not a murderer, not a person whose life should be in the gift of the state. So I find it repulsive, and indeed decadent, to have her continued existence framed in terms of ''plaintiffs'' and ''petitions'' and ''en banc review'' and ''de novo'' and all the other legalese. Mrs. Schiavo has been in her present condition for 15 years. Whoever she once was, this is who she is now -- and, after a decade and a half, there is no compelling reason to kill her. Any legal system with a decent respect for the status quo -- something too many American judges are increasingly disdainful of -- would recognize that her present life, in all its limitations, is now a well-established fact, and it is the most grotesque judicial overreaching for any court at this late stage to decide enough is enough. It would be one thing had a doctor decided to reach for the morphine and ''put her out of her misery'' after a week in her diminished state; after 15 years, for the courts to treat her like a Death Row killer who's exhausted her appeals is simply vile.

There seems to be a genuine dispute about her condition -- between those on her husband's side, who say she has ''no consciousness,'' and those on her parents' side, who say she is capable of basic, childlike reactions. If the latter are correct, ending her life is an act of murder. If the former are correct, what difference does it make? If she feels nothing -- if there's no there there -- she has no misery to be put out of. That being so, why not err in favor of the non-irreversible option?